On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 12:02, Fran�ois Pons wrote:

> > What's going on?
> 
> I don't see any problem, what is wrong ? beware that libglib2.O-devel
> may be a virtual provide (ie not a package name), furthermore, if you
> encounter a bug, please send me a bug report.
> 
> Fran�ois.

The problem is that urpmi has never complained about these missing
dependencies before, and I don't think they're actually missing. I
always update my system with urpmi --auto-select, so there certainly
shouldn't be any unsatisfied dependencies.
-- 
adamw


Reply via email to