Le lun 03/02/2003 � 14:27, Adam Williamson a �crit : > On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 12:02, Fran�ois Pons wrote: > > > > What's going on? > > > > I don't see any problem, what is wrong ? beware that libglib2.O-devel > > may be a virtual provide (ie not a package name), furthermore, if you > > encounter a bug, please send me a bug report. > > > > Fran�ois. > > The problem is that urpmi has never complained about these missing > dependencies before, and I don't think they're actually missing. I > always update my system with urpmi --auto-select, so there certainly > shouldn't be any unsatisfied dependencies.
The problem doesn't come with unsatisfied dependencies actually present on your system, but about unsatisfied dependencies due to remove a package in order to upgrade some other, and broken dependencies are used to find additional package to remove. Fran�ois.
