Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Walser wrote: > > I wonder if the author is aware of diskdrake. Maybe > > he could learn something from its UI. > > > > Also vice versa, maybe the diskdrake authors could > > learn something from it. QTParted definately has a > > better sizer widget, as can be seen here: > > http://members.xoom.virgilio.it/zanac/qtparted/screenshot/shot2.jpg > [...] > So, clearly I would want the filesystem sizes to match as well as > possible. An editable text box would have saved me about 2000 arrow key > presses on the box with hardware raid, and about 5000 on the box with > software raid, since you will notice I first had to size the software > RAID partitions, then the LVM, then the real partitions, and at 100GB, > the smallest increment on the mouse is somewhere between 500MB and 1GB ... > > Of course, this one: > > http://members.xoom.virgilio.it/zanac/qtparted/screenshot/shot2.jpg > is still missing a drop-down box on the dialog in place of the MB, which > should be something like (MB|GB|TB) (kB probably not useful), where > MB,GB,TB actually are MiB,GiB (1024MiB),TiB etc.
if someone gives me some code doing this (in perl or C), i'll include it, promised!
