Oden Eriksson wrote: > torsdagen den 13 februari 2003 10.49 skrev Buchan Milne: >> >>Hmmm, just when I went and made the festival srpm have seperate binary >>packages, and had it ready to upload! > > > Hey, as long as it works. >
I would prefer to have working headers. I do not know if there are apps that use the libraries (many seem to just pipe text into festival --tts), but if there are we might as well do it now. >>OK, I have now working voices (festvox, to use the name of the tarballs) >>and dictionary (festlex, same reason) packages. All festvox packages >>provide festival-voice (and some more such as festival-voice-english, >>festival-voice-en_UK etc), and festival requires festival-voice. The >>voice packages require the dictionary packages they need. urpmi prompts >>to choose the festvox package, only thing is it seems festival does not >>start up without the kal diphone, so I might have to require that. Just >>need to split off the non-free voices into a seperate srpm and we are >>ready ... > > > Cool! > > To be honest it sounds like greek to me as I don't know how to use any of this > stuff... Do we have any blind listeners and experts here who could shed some > light on this festival stuff? On the plf list is someone working on the accessibility stuff in KDE who also requested this go into contrib, so I think he should be able to test ... > > >>But I will take a look at the pld stuff now ... > > There where some interesting patches in there. > I am more interested at the moment in their scripts to fix the #includes in festival to make it compile against speech tools headers ... Buchan -- |--------------Another happy Mandrake Club member--------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
