On Friday 14 February 2003 3:09 pm, Lea Gris wrote:
*snip*
>
> Ok, but ...
>
> How man is supposed to upgrade to 9.1 when it is out if it was not a
> fully tested process ?
>
> Aren't we supposed to test cooker and report bugs ?
>
> I think the upgrade process is *a very important feature* that *should*
> be *deeply tested* here.
>
> How are we able to get reliable upgrade process if it is not tested
> though all along the cooker maturation ?
>
> regards,
You do a FULL upgrade to cooker, making sure that ALL packages are cooker 
packages..
-- 
Chuck Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to