On Friday 14 February 2003 3:09 pm, Lea Gris wrote: *snip* > > Ok, but ... > > How man is supposed to upgrade to 9.1 when it is out if it was not a > fully tested process ? > > Aren't we supposed to test cooker and report bugs ? > > I think the upgrade process is *a very important feature* that *should* > be *deeply tested* here. > > How are we able to get reliable upgrade process if it is not tested > though all along the cooker maturation ? > > regards, You do a FULL upgrade to cooker, making sure that ALL packages are cooker packages.. -- Chuck Burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- [Cooker] 2 Problems: Mozilla (crash) & OpenOffic... Pedro Soria-Rodriguez
- Re: [Cooker] 2 Problems: Mozilla (crash) & ... tux torvalds
- Re: [Cooker] 2 Problems: Mozilla (crash) & ... Pedro Soria-Rodriguez
- Re: [Cooker] 2 Problems: Mozilla (crash) & ... Danny Tholen
- Re: [Cooker] 2 Problems: Mozilla (crash) &a... Lea Gris
- Re: [Cooker] 2 Problems: Mozilla (crash... Chuck Burns
- Re: [Cooker] 2 Problems: Mozilla (c... James Sparenberg
- Re: [Cooker] 2 Problems: Mozil... Buchan Milne
- Re: [Cooker] 2 Problems: Mozil... Adam Williamson
- Re: [Cooker] 2 Problems: M... James Sparenberg
- Re: [Cooker] 2 Problems: Mozilla (c... Lea Gris
- [Cooker] Re: 2 Problems: Mozilla (crash) & ... Pedro Soria-Rodriguez