https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-02-20 15:36 -------
> Is there any reason for the "new" design?   
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-  
> We think that KDM availalble in KDE 3.1 is not correctly designed. If you don't  
> think as  
> us, please use original KDM. We don't remove it. You are free to use it.  
 
Your vision of "correctly designed" is very special. I think, 95% of the people will 
prefer the original kdm. A lot of work has to be done to improve the usuability of 
kdmmdk. 
 
 



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.



------- Reminder: -------
assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: RESOLVED
creation_date: 
description: 
I've openned this as a bug because I think it has real usability and security 
problems, 
and because there is an easy solution: 
 
The new Mandrake "kdm" that removes the login text field, forces users to login in 
only 
if they are listed, and makes loging in a two-stage process is a big usability and 
security 
problem. 
 
A good solution would probably be: 
 
1) A mdkkdm package (that can be installed by default) that has this new kdm in it 
(although, I surely hope that it is improved before it's used anywhere!) 
 
2) The original unmodified (but it can be branded, as usual--we have no problem with 
that) kdm being installed by kdebase, and used if mdkkdm is not installed. 
 
Others have made plenty of comments in the cooker ML and can add comments here 
as appropriate.

Reply via email to