-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> > KDE 3.1 comes with a lot of really great screen savers and I'm truly > > mystified as to why at least some of them aren't included. Unless > > Mandrake now prefers GNOME over KDE, if GNOME is getting xscreensavers, > > shouldn't KDE get kscreensavers? > > Well, xscreensavers is not GNOME specific... True, but if you consider that about 99% (okay, I'm just pulling that out of the air) of new users -- the kind that are going to be mystified by a problem like this -- are going to use either KDE or GNOME. Actually, most people are probably going to use one of the two. Also, if a user just skips the FirstTime wizard, they get KDE. So there is probably a good chance that 75% or more of new users use KDE. So shouldn't KDE have screensavers? -Tim - -- - ---------------------------------------------------------------- Timothy R. Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Universal Networks http://www.uninet.info Christian Portal and Search Tool: http://www.faithtree.com Enterprise Open Source Journal: http://www.ofb.biz ================================================================ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+Zl5+K37Cns9gJ0gRArvsAJ9H2FqAX7aq3ZY75NzTPDhAv3aXQwCcDOCH mD0WXG9QKAv4x/XYzNYnNEw= =4u0Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
