And me On Wednesday 05 March 2003 22:40, N Smethurst wrote: > I realise that I am a relative minnow here, but I nevertheless wish to > express my agreement with Tim. I'm glad someone has expressed what I > hesitated to say. > > Le Mercredi 5 Mars 2003 22:07, Timothy R. Butler a �crit : > > Is it worth risking Mandrake's future as a whole to get this > > distribution out by mid-March? I just don't personally see that as a > > realistic date when I'm using RC2. Mandrake developers are amazing > > people, but I still can't believe all of these problems can be fixed in > > just nine days. To me, RC2 seems more like a beta release and not a > > release candidate.
- [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be Delayed Timothy R. Butler
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be Delayed N Smethurst
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be Delayed John van Spaandonk
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be Delaye... Jason Komar
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be Delayed Paul Dorman
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be Delayed Todd Lyons
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be Delaye... Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be De... Buchan Milne
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should ... Per �yvind Karlsen
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be Delayed Buchan Milne
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be Delaye... Paul Dorman
- Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 9.1 Should be Delayed Jan Ciger
