http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2265
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|dhcp address assigned even |zeroconf route added even |though static IP is present |though static IP is present |(mandrake-9.1rc1/2) |(mandrake-9.1rc1/2) ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-09 00:25 ------- I am not sure that your bug report is correct, since you only show the routing table. Can you confirm otherwise that the dhcpclient has been run? Fred, I think the problem is that the zeroconf route is being addded regardless of whether a zeroconf ip has been used or not. This also affects dhcp users, since on a network with a dhcp server (ie not using zeroconf), the route should not be set (unless you are trying to attempt hotplugging even when ifplugd does not work?). So, I have changed the summary to reflect this. [EMAIL PROTECTED], can you confirm whether my hypothesis here is correct? (ie, if you have access to the logs on a dhcp server on your network, can you see a DHCPDISCOVER request coming from this machine?) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ------- Reminder: ------- assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] status: UNCONFIRMED creation_date: description: Using mdk-9.1rc1. In drakconnect, a static IP has been assigned and the box for dhcp is unchecked. In spite of that, "route -en" shows a dhcp related entry: Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 As is noticable, the static IP is working just fine. But the dhcp-client is still trying to get a dhcp address (in this case it has failed).