Hi Tomek, This looks quite interesting as although ThinLto reults in some slower executables this slight disadvantage is balanced out by significant improvements in build time and memory consumption. With the prospect of further optimisation in later releases it could be worthwhile choice assuming there are no unseen gotcha's. Best, Colin
On Tuesday, 20 August 2019 14:46:07 BST Tomasz Gajc wrote: > Hi, > > what do you think to start to use by default -flto=thin ? > We may benefit from using thiner LTO objects. > > More info can be found here: > https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThinLTO.html > http://blog.llvm.org/2016/06/thinlto-scalable-and-incremental-lto.html >
