It's polite when on the net to turn off your taglines when replying to posts. It's meaningless noise in a message that slows down reading. I guess I'm a bit old school when dealing with email traffic, as I also find anything more than a three line signature to be abusive, as per the same standards of net politeness. Charles, I'm pretty sure anyone who's been on here knows that you prefer GSD's as guide dogs, (contrary to what the schools are saying these days, as many are moving away from them as guides because they don't feel they're appropriate in our modern day and setting due to their shorter attention span and stronger prey instinct than other breeds used as guides) but it'd be nice if I didn't have to wade through it every time I wanted to see to what your responding. I get a *lot* of email traffic, and this just adds extra time in reading or navigating through extra lines in a message that serves no purpose and conveys no additional information of any value.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Cookinginthedark [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Charles Rivard > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 12:00 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [CnD] tag lines - Re: cooking without looking > > They don't slow down the seeing or receiving posts, and are a freedom > of speech which should not be curtailed. If you don't want to read > them, down arrow past them to see what the poster is replying to. > Thanks. > > --- > Shepherds are the best beasts, but Labs are a close second. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nicole Massey" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:25 AM > Subject: Re: [CnD] cooking without looking > > > > Yes, it's available as a Braille book from the BARD site. It's > reference > > code is BR 13478. > > Folks, *please* disable your taglines when responding to messages. It > > slows > > down the process of seeing the message you're responding to, and it > gets > > very old reading the same quips all the time. > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Cookinginthedark [mailto:cookinginthedark- > [email protected]] > >> On Behalf Of Charles Rivard > >> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:21 AM > >> To: COOKING IN THE DARK > >> Subject: [CnD] cooking without looking > >> > >> Not sure where to get it, but here are some thoughts: You might > check > >> out BARD if you are a user of the NLS services. It might be > available > >> in either Talking Book or braille format. Also, it's possible that > you > >> can get it from > >> > >> www.nbp.org > >> > >> HTH. > >> > >> --- > >> Shepherds are the best beasts, but Labs are a close second. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Cookinginthedark mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://acbradio.org/mailman/listinfo/cookinginthedark > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Cookinginthedark mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://acbradio.org/mailman/listinfo/cookinginthedark > > _______________________________________________ > Cookinginthedark mailing list > [email protected] > http://acbradio.org/mailman/listinfo/cookinginthedark _______________________________________________ Cookinginthedark mailing list [email protected] http://acbradio.org/mailman/listinfo/cookinginthedark
