My tag line is not offensive, it is short, and to the point. It is a
freedom of speech that should bother noone. It is a very, very minor
difficulty for you to down arrow past it to see the message I am replying
to, and it does not take much effort or time to do so, nor does it cause
extra traffic on the list. Unless asked to do so by the list owner or
moderator, it will remain.
---
Shepherds are the best beasts, but Labs are a close second.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nicole Massey" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: [CnD] tag lines - Re: cooking without looking
It's polite when on the net to turn off your taglines when replying to
posts. It's meaningless noise in a message that slows down reading. I
guess
I'm a bit old school when dealing with email traffic, as I also find
anything more than a three line signature to be abusive, as per the same
standards of net politeness.
Charles, I'm pretty sure anyone who's been on here knows that you prefer
GSD's as guide dogs, (contrary to what the schools are saying these days,
as
many are moving away from them as guides because they don't feel they're
appropriate in our modern day and setting due to their shorter attention
span and stronger prey instinct than other breeds used as guides) but it'd
be nice if I didn't have to wade through it every time I wanted to see to
what your responding. I get a *lot* of email traffic, and this just adds
extra time in reading or navigating through extra lines in a message that
serves no purpose and conveys no additional information of any value.
-----Original Message-----
From: Cookinginthedark [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Charles Rivard
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 12:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [CnD] tag lines - Re: cooking without looking
They don't slow down the seeing or receiving posts, and are a freedom
of speech which should not be curtailed. If you don't want to read
them, down arrow past them to see what the poster is replying to.
Thanks.
---
Shepherds are the best beasts, but Labs are a close second.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nicole Massey" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: [CnD] cooking without looking
> Yes, it's available as a Braille book from the BARD site. It's
reference
> code is BR 13478.
> Folks, *please* disable your taglines when responding to messages. It
> slows
> down the process of seeing the message you're responding to, and it
gets
> very old reading the same quips all the time.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Cookinginthedark [mailto:cookinginthedark-
[email protected]]
>> On Behalf Of Charles Rivard
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:21 AM
>> To: COOKING IN THE DARK
>> Subject: [CnD] cooking without looking
>>
>> Not sure where to get it, but here are some thoughts: You might
check
>> out BARD if you are a user of the NLS services. It might be
available
>> in either Talking Book or braille format. Also, it's possible that
you
>> can get it from
>>
>> www.nbp.org
>>
>> HTH.
>>
>> ---
>> Shepherds are the best beasts, but Labs are a close second.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cookinginthedark mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://acbradio.org/mailman/listinfo/cookinginthedark
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cookinginthedark mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://acbradio.org/mailman/listinfo/cookinginthedark
_______________________________________________
Cookinginthedark mailing list
[email protected]
http://acbradio.org/mailman/listinfo/cookinginthedark
_______________________________________________
Cookinginthedark mailing list
[email protected]
http://acbradio.org/mailman/listinfo/cookinginthedark
_______________________________________________
Cookinginthedark mailing list
[email protected]
http://acbradio.org/mailman/listinfo/cookinginthedark
