On 09/12/2013 16:25, Roland Perry wrote: > I noticed the BOF [1] but hadn't realised it was already a WG (as Nick > suggested).
E&OE: it's still a bof. Nick
On 09/12/2013 16:25, Roland Perry wrote: > I noticed the BOF [1] but hadn't realised it was already a WG (as Nick > suggested).
E&OE: it's still a bof. Nick