On 26 jan 2014, at 17:27, Roland Perry <[email protected]> wrote:
>> And I thought this paper was about domains more than domain registries? > > Yes, which is why the paper should positively avoid the inclusion of > confusing examples such as domains operated by I* entities. My view is that a paper should include example domain names that are defined to be example domain names. See RFC2606 / RFC6761 (i.e. BCP32). I.e. I think the author of this document has done the right thing. Patrik
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
