On 24-05-16 14:20, Meredith Whittaker wrote:
> We have three people (and maybe more -- speak up!) who meet this criteria.
This is a tentative hand going up. I am potentially interested
in assisting as a co-chair, but I think I have some questions
about the actual role of the co-chairs of this wg.
Just like Jim and Patrik, I feel that it is important that the
co-chairs are familiar with and to our community. While it is
also important that they are familiar with what is going on
in Brussels and Geneva, I feel that the role of the co-chars
doesn't necessarily require personal involvement in the outreach
activities and government/regulatory activities. I feel it is
more important that the co-chairs encourage people involved in
those activities to share their findings with the WG and the
community, and raise the flag on significant activities the
community should be aware of (and possibly try to see if there
is a consensus view within the community on those issues).
Is this a view shared by the rest of the WG?
Unfortunately I will have to leave Copenhagen Thursday
morning, so I won't be able to be at the WG session in
person :(.
Julf
