On 25 May 2016, at 15:25, Johan Helsingius wrote: > On 25-05-16 15:15, Patrik Fältström wrote: >> Although of course it is good if we also have consensus. > > Just to clarify - there was definitely a reason I put all those modifiers in > the phrase "possibly try to see if there is a > consensus view". I don't see it as the job of the WG or the > co-chairs to force a single shared view - only to articulate a common view in > case there is one.
We completely agree!!! Again! :-D Patrik
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
