All, I agree with Patrik, nicely written and I am glad the RIPE NCC is tracking such things. It is a pity that these issues apparently need to be re-visited constantly, but I appreciate that the RIPE NCC is willing to fight the same battles!
Cheers, -- Shane At 2016-10-20 14:14:25 +0200 "Patrik Fältström" <[email protected]> wrote: > A good response, thanks! > > Specifically: > > > While the liaison statement notes the Study Group's intention to cooperate > > closely with > > "the IETF, the IPv6 Forum, ISOC, ETSI and other relevant stakeholders and > > academic > > partners", we would suggest that such cooperation (in the context of IPv6 > > addressing) > > should be characterised by the Study Group's incorporation of policies or > > best practices > > developed in these other communities. > > Patrik > > On 20 Oct 2016, at 11:01, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > > > Dear colleagues, > > > > We would like to inform you that we have published our response to a > > Liaison Statement that we recently received on behalf of ITU Study Group > > 20, which is working on the Internet of Things (IoT) and its applications, > > including smart cities and communities. > > > > The incoming Liaison Statement as well as our response can be found on the > > RIPE NCC’s website: > > > > https://www.ripe.net/publications/news/industry-developments/ripe-ncc-supplies-feedback-to-itu-study-group-on-internet-of-things > > > > In case you have any questions regarding this topic, feel free to contact > > us via email, this mailing list or you can contact me or one of my > > colleagues during next week’s RIPE meeting, taking place in Madrid, Spain. > > > > Regards, > > > > Marco Hogewoning > > -- > > External Relations - RIPE NCC > >
pgp8lWxKBax_j.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
