Agreed Shane, on both fronts (+1 to the statement and +1 to the willingness to keep addressing similar (if not the same) issues by RIPE NCC).
Best, -Michael On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Shane Kerr <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > I agree with Patrik, nicely written and I am glad the RIPE NCC is > tracking such things. It is a pity that these issues apparently need > to be re-visited constantly, but I appreciate that the RIPE NCC is > willing to fight the same battles! > > Cheers, > > -- > Shane > > At 2016-10-20 14:14:25 +0200 > "Patrik Fältström" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > A good response, thanks! > > > > Specifically: > > > > > While the liaison statement notes the Study Group's intention to > cooperate closely with > > > "the IETF, the IPv6 Forum, ISOC, ETSI and other relevant stakeholders > and academic > > > partners", we would suggest that such cooperation (in the context of > IPv6 addressing) > > > should be characterised by the Study Group's incorporation of policies > or best practices > > > developed in these other communities. > > > > Patrik > > > > On 20 Oct 2016, at 11:01, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > > > > > Dear colleagues, > > > > > > We would like to inform you that we have published our response to a > Liaison Statement that we recently received on behalf of ITU Study Group > 20, which is working on the Internet of Things (IoT) and its applications, > including smart cities and communities. > > > > > > The incoming Liaison Statement as well as our response can be found on > the RIPE NCC’s website: > > > > > > https://www.ripe.net/publications/news/industry-developments/ripe-ncc- > supplies-feedback-to-itu-study-group-on-internet-of-things > > > > > > In case you have any questions regarding this topic, feel free to > contact us via email, this mailing list or you can contact me or one of my > colleagues during next week’s RIPE meeting, taking place in Madrid, Spain. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Marco Hogewoning > > > -- > > > External Relations - RIPE NCC > > > >
