Hi Desiree, Hi Julf, Thanks for taking the initiative and for reporting back to the list. I shared the link with the RIPE DNS WG.
Kind regards, Mirjam Kühne On 18/03/2021 15:20, Desiree Miloshevic wrote: > > Dear members of the Working Group > > The Cooperation Working Group held a remote session last week, the > archives of which have been shared to the list. It was clear during > that session that there were concerns from members of the RIPE > community, and that the timeline for making any formal response was > very limited (with a deadline of 18 March). > > Unfortunately, despite some very active discussion during the session, > there was not much further discussion on the list. However, the > Working Group Co-Chairs felt that, while there is not agreed “RIPE > community position”, it is important that the concerns raised should > be conveyed to EU policymakers. > > To that end, two of the Co-Chairs (not including Achilleas, who has > recused himself from this activity as an employee of the European > Commission) have developed a response to the current open consultation > that highlights the key concerns expressed in the remote session. The > submission asks that EU policymakers work closely with members of the > RIPE community to refine the NIS2 draft and address the concerns raised. > > You can find the details of our Co-Chairs submission here: > > https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12475-Cybersecurity-review-of-EU-rules-on-the-security-of-network-and-information-systems/F2004655 > <https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12475-Cybersecurity-review-of-EU-rules-on-the-security-of-network-and-information-systems/F2004655> > > Regards > > Desiree and Julf. > > RIPE Coop WG Co-Chairs >
