On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 04:23:11PM -0000, John Bunzl wrote: > That's right. But also I think we need an altogether more sophisticated > understanding of both competition and cooperation.
Completely agreed. Saying "cooperation good" and "competition bad" is nearly as silly as saying, "inhaling good" and "exhaling bad". Both functions create results of which we humans are fond and other results of which we are less fond. Hence I rail at the current domination of discourse by the competition narrative. Competition can be a useful lens, so can cooperation. rl --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CooperationCommons" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CooperationCommons?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
