Search Twitter for "earthquake" today and you will see hundreds of  
responses during the first minute after the quake.

Howard Rheingold [email protected] http://twitter.com/hrheingold
http://www.rheingold.com  http://www.smartmobs.com
http://vlog.rheingold.com
what it is ---> is --->up to us



On Mar 30, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Mark Elliott wrote:

> Thanks Howard and Nancy! - from the article upon first scan:
>
> ...SMS and mobile IM messages seem to hold a much stricter timetable  
> [than instant messaging].  Almost all participants indicated a  
> punctual 5-15 minutes response time at replying to messages they  
> receive.  They expect similar response time for messages that they  
> send out, so much so that most of them claimed that they would  
> follow-up with a second message or phone call, if no response was  
> given within 2 hours.
>
> Also of note:
>
> All participants responded that they almost always immediately  
> notice the notification and immediately
> respond by reading the SMS/mobile IM message. In contrast,  
> participants indicated they are more likely to negotiate their  
> response time when dealing with desktop/laptop IM messages, leading  
> to longer delays before reading the message.
>
> As many of you probably are aware of, here in Australia, in my state  
> Victoria, we had some pretty horrendous bushfires (forest fires) -  
> many lives lost, completely unprecedented fire dynamics etc. My  
> consultancy is providing advice and strategy to emergency services  
> bodies regarding options for enabling smart mobs via social media,  
> SMS and other distributed communications which got me wondering  
> about response time.
>
> It's interesting to think about the network effects of cascading  
> responses, each taking 5-15 minutes - which actually adds up to  
> sizable delays. However this doesn't take into consideration sending  
> messages to groups, or even how many individual messages might be  
> sent out after receiving one high priority / important message -  
> which could create exponentially growing cascades of recipents.
>
> Of course a major problem we had with the last fires was that mobile/ 
> cell phone coverage went down in effected areas as cell towers were  
> consumed in the fires...
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Nancy McClure <[email protected]>  
> wrote:
> this study has a short section on the immediacy of recognition, and  
> begins to allude to the impact upon social response. No hard  
> metrics, but could lead you to more...
> http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~jasonh/publications/CHI2006-kptang-workshop-chi2006.pdf
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Mark Elliott <[email protected]>  
> wrote:
> Has anyone come across any research on average SMS text message  
> response time - that is, the average time it takes for someone to  
> respond to an SMS text message (not the technical potential speed,  
> but the social speed)?
>
> Just curious as it seems like it would be an interesting indicator  
> regarding speed of potential cooperation via SMS smartmob networks...
>
> Thoughts?
> Mark
>
>
> -- 
> -----
> Mark Elliott, PhD
> Director, CollabForge pty ltd
> collaboration ~ mass collaboration ~ social software
> http://Collabforge.com ~ http://Mark-Elliott.net ~ http://MetaCollab.net
> Phone: 0421 978 501 (international callers: +614 21 978 501)
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> http://apertedesign.typepad.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> -----
> Mark Elliott, PhD
> Director, CollabForge pty ltd
> collaboration ~ mass collaboration ~ social software
> http://Collabforge.com ~ http://Mark-Elliott.net ~ http://MetaCollab.net
> Phone: 0421 978 501 (international callers: +614 21 978 501)
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CooperationCommons" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/CooperationCommons?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to