Wow, that's a great idea. I'll keep it in mind for further development - I'm
sure there's an application for this lurking round in my sphere...

Thanks for sharing!
Mark

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:03 AM, Paul B. Hartzog <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> Sam and I can do instant visualizations of this data
>
> (for example, see here
>
> http://socialsynergyweb.org/culturing/blog/local-food-systems-web-and-network-architecture-local-food-systems
> )
>
> if anyone is interested and/or willing to help out, please let us know
>
> thx
> -p
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Mark Elliott <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > The same thing happened with a quake in Melbourne last week - even
> thought
> > it was very small and local, there was loads of twitter action.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Howard Rheingold <[email protected]
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Search Twitter for "earthquake" today and you will see hundreds of
> >> responses during the first minute after the quake.
> >> Howard Rheingold [email protected] http://twitter.com/hrheingold
> >> http://www.rheingold.com  http://www.smartmobs.com
> >> http://vlog.rheingold.com
> >> what it is ---> is --->up to us
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mar 30, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Mark Elliott wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks Howard and Nancy! - from the article upon first scan:
> >>
> >>> ...SMS and mobile IM messages seem to hold a much stricter timetable
> >>> [than instant messaging].  Almost all participants indicated a punctual
> 5-15
> >>> minutes response time at replying to messages they receive.  They
> expect
> >>> similar response time for messages that they send out, so much so that
> most
> >>> of them claimed that they would follow-up with a second message or
> phone
> >>> call, if no response was given within 2 hours.
> >>
> >> Also of note:
> >>
> >>> All participants responded that they almost always immediately notice
> the
> >>> notification and immediately
> >>> respond by reading the SMS/mobile IM message. In contrast, participants
> >>> indicated they are more likely to negotiate their response time when
> dealing
> >>> with desktop/laptop IM messages, leading to longer delays before
> reading the
> >>> message.
> >>
> >> As many of you probably are aware of, here in Australia, in my state
> >> Victoria, we had some pretty horrendous bushfires (forest fires) - many
> >> lives lost, completely unprecedented fire dynamics etc. My consultancy
> is
> >> providing advice and strategy to emergency services bodies regarding
> options
> >> for enabling smart mobs via social media, SMS and other distributed
> >> communications which got me wondering about response time.
> >>
> >> It's interesting to think about the network effects of cascading
> >> responses, each taking 5-15 minutes - which actually adds up to sizable
> >> delays. However this doesn't take into consideration sending messages to
> >> groups, or even how many individual messages might be sent out after
> >> receiving one high priority / important message - which could create
> >> exponentially growing cascades of recipents.
> >>
> >> Of course a major problem we had with the last fires was that
> mobile/cell
> >> phone coverage went down in effected areas as cell towers were consumed
> in
> >> the fires...
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Nancy McClure <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> this study has a short section on the immediacy of recognition, and
> >>> begins to allude to the impact upon social response. No hard metrics,
> but
> >>> could lead you to more...
> >>>
> >>>
> http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~jasonh/publications/CHI2006-kptang-workshop-chi2006.pdf<http://www.cs.cmu.edu/%7Ejasonh/publications/CHI2006-kptang-workshop-chi2006.pdf>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Mark Elliott <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Has anyone come across any research on average SMS text message
> response
> >>>> time - that is, the average time it takes for someone to respond to an
> SMS
> >>>> text message (not the technical potential speed, but the social
> speed)?
> >>>>
> >>>> Just curious as it seems like it would be an interesting indicator
> >>>> regarding speed of potential cooperation via SMS smartmob networks...
> >>>>
> >>>> Thoughts?
> >>>> Mark
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> -----
> >>>> Mark Elliott, PhD
> >>>> Director, CollabForge pty ltd
> >>>> collaboration ~ mass collaboration ~ social software
> >>>> http://Collabforge.com ~ http://Mark-Elliott.net ~
> http://MetaCollab.net
> >>>> Phone: 0421 978 501 (international callers: +614 21 978 501)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> http://apertedesign.typepad.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> -----
> >> Mark Elliott, PhD
> >> Director, CollabForge pty ltd
> >> collaboration ~ mass collaboration ~ social software
> >> http://Collabforge.com ~ http://Mark-Elliott.net ~
> http://MetaCollab.net
> >> Phone: 0421 978 501 (international callers: +614 21 978 501)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -----
> > Mark Elliott, PhD
> > Director, CollabForge pty ltd
> > collaboration ~ mass collaboration ~ social software
> > http://Collabforge.com ~ http://Mark-Elliott.net ~ http://MetaCollab.net
> > Phone: 0421 978 501 (international callers: +614 21 978 501)
> >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.PaulBHartzog.org
> http://www.panarchy.com
> [email protected]
> [email protected]
> [email protected]
> --------------------------------------------------------
> The Universe is made up of stories, not atoms.
>                 --Muriel Rukeyser
>
> See differently, then you will act differently.
>                  --Paul B. Hartzog
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> >
>


-- 
-----
Mark Elliott, PhD
Director, CollabForge pty ltd
collaboration ~ mass collaboration ~ social software
http://Collabforge.com ~ http://Mark-Elliott.net ~ http://MetaCollab.net
Phone: 0421 978 501 (international callers: +614 21 978 501)

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CooperationCommons" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/CooperationCommons?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to