On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:37:07 -0800 "William G. Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 18, 2008, at 6:26 PM, Tim Fenn wrote: > > > The reason I bring up the guile dependencies in particular is > > they're the only tricky part in getting rpms made, since without an > > upstream, they're unlikely to get accepted. Otherwise I'd be happy > > to contribute > > those as well to fedora. > > > Create a distraction and sneak them in. > > http://diablo.ucsc.edu/~wgscott/debian/rpm/coot/dependencies/ > > But seriously, if they are GPL-ed, why not just stick them in coot's > scheme directory and be done with it? Sure, I'll give that a try, with the exception of guile-gtk (its a library that doesn't seem to be necessary for most guile functions - is this correct, paul?). -tim -- --------------------------------------------------------- Tim Fenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stanford University, School of Medicine James H. Clark Center 318 Campus Drive, Room E300 Stanford, CA 94305-5432 Phone: (650) 736-1714 FAX: (650) 736-1961 ---------------------------------------------------------
