-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Bernhard,
this sounds odd - wouldn't both maps be calculated from F/PHI by coot itself? Why would Paul (Kevin?) make a difference there between phenix and refmac5? Curiously, Tim On 01/17/2013 10:23 AM, Bernhard Lohkamp wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > this is due to the map sampling (which seems different between the > two programs). Anyway, for now you can change the weighting > manually: > > Extensions->Refinement->Set Density Fit Graph Weight > > B > > On 17/01/2013 10:11, Pedro M. Matias wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I encountered a strange problem while running the "Density Fit >> Analysis" widget on a structure refined with PHENIX. All residues >> are represented with a red bar (see picture) with low CC. >> >> Using the same input coordinate and MTZ file in REFMAC produces >> normal "Density Fit Analysis" graphs (see picture). >> >> I am at a loss to understand why this is happening... >> >> This happens with both 0.6.2 and 0.7 versions of Coot. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Pedro. >> >> >> Industry and Medicine Applied Crystallography Macromolecular >> Crystallography Unit ___________________________________ Phones : >> (351-21) 446-9100 Ext. 1669 (351-21) 446-9669 (direct) Fax : >> (351-21) 441-1277 or 443-3644 >> >> email : mat...@itqb.unl.pt >> >> http://www.itqb.unl.pt/research/biological-chemistry/industry-and-medicine-applied-crystallography >> >> >> >> http://www.itqb.unl.pt/labs/macromolecular-crystallography-unit >> >> Mailing address : Instituto de Tecnologia Quimica e Biologica >> Apartado 127 2781-901 OEIRAS Portugal > - -- - -- Dr Tim Gruene Institut fuer anorganische Chemie Tammannstr. 4 D-37077 Goettingen GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFQ98yxUxlJ7aRr7hoRAk6dAJ40C/NnDzSq5qwUge8smqs12jvolACeJzP+ x8dEGDrJzHvkVekddgcvPgs= =aZ9b -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
