On 20/05/14 15:10, George Devaniranjan wrote:
Hi,

Hi George,

Sorry for the delay.


I am new to COOT

Hello.  Welcome.

and electron density analysis and I have been reading the manual and the tutorials so far. I have a question to which I have yet been unable to find an answer.

It's hard to answer - there isn't a tool that gives you a number from which you can make a yes/no decision.

We like to look at the model and the electron density to see if it "looks good" :-)


I took a fragment (a part of the whole protein) modified it slightly (made all the omega angles close to 180) and I want to see "how well it still fits" the e-density. A quantitative measure of how well this "ideal" protein fits into the e-denisty.
Can it still be identified ?

Have you tried density-score-by-residue?

$ density-score-by-residue
Usage: /home/paule/Projects/build-enhanced-ligand/src/.libs/lt-density-score-by-residue-real --pdbin pdb-in-filename --hklin mtz-filename --f f_col_label --phi phi_col_label --weight weight_col_label --score-atoms --cut --cut-level (absolute) level --pdbout pdb-out-filename
     where pdbin is the protein (typically)


I want to "measure" how well my "new" fragment's C-ALPHA carbon's fit the e-density (not really worried about the side chains at this point).

To use density-score-by-residue you'd need to create a pdb file without side-chains.


Basically I want to know from more experienced crystallographers whether if I gave this fragment you would accept it as a good "starting" structure for the given e-density?

We would look at the correlation coefficients.  Or I would at least.

You can get something like that - and more sophisticated scoring even - using CCP4's EDSTATS. That may help.

Paul.

Reply via email to