Hi Paul, set_do_probe_dots_on_rotamers_and_chis doesn’t involve communication between Phenix and Coot does it? These are just the probe dots that appear when switching between rotamers in the regular rotamers dialog, when Coot is not connected to Phenix.
Hi Paul - you mean you can’t download the -pre binaries from Bill Scott’s website, right? I think that’s because he stopped putting them up online because they were all crashing with a segfault. Yep, I’m on 10.11, but I believe the same issue was occurring with 10.10 - Bill was experiencing the same problem when I reported it to him a while back. set_residue_to_rotamer_number should do the trick, thanks! Cheers, Oli. > On Nov 4, 2015, at 6:53 AM, Paul Emsley <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 28/10/15 17:12, Oliver Clarke wrote: >> Also, relating to set_do_probe_dots_on_rotamers_and_chis - it would be >> better I think if probe dots were dismissed upon dismissing the rotamers >> dialog. > > That would involve better communication between Phenix and Coot. I'm all for > it. > >> >> Right now they remain, even if the rotamer they relate to was not selected. >> (Also, the latest nightlies still give a segfault upon launch when built on >> Mac - any chance of a fix?) > > I am currently unable to download pre-release binaries (10.10.x) so can't > test this at the moment. Are you using 10.11.x? > >> >> Incidentally relating to rotamers, I would love to have a shortcut to cycle >> through possible rotamers for the active residue without having to launch >> the rotamers dialog, but I can't seem to figure out how to build that using >> any of the python functions that are available - anyone have any ideas? >> > > set_residue_to_rotamer_number(imol, chain_id, res_no, ins_code, > rotamer_number) is probably what you want. > > Paul. >
