On 6/25/20 10:08 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> breaks -- specifically on COPR? >> _either_ form seems to be ok with rpmbuild -- locally. > > Good question. I don't think so, but I didn't get to more deep observation > yet. > > Have you tried to put `%define _disable_source_fetch 0` into your > ~/.rpmmacros, > and then put %undefine into the spec, and is it still working? (copr isn't > doing anything else).
nope ... I can give it a whirl. tho' not clear on what that tells me, or why it might be a 'solution' >> i'll change it in my spec in any case. > > Good, just let me know it is OK. k >> iiuc then, this needs to be fixed in online COPR before this'll work? > > We need to fix copr so it works with the %undefine variant, yes. At least if > it is valid configuration. I did not check the semantics of the macros across > distro versions, but what makes you think that "undefining" the macro is > equivalent to allow "download random spec-requested blobs from the internet"? initially, while scrounging around trying to _not_ have to manually use spectool 1st, these: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33177450/how-do-i-get-rpmbuild-to-download-all-of-the-sources-for-a-particular-spec https://jmahler.github.io/linux/2018/06/28/fedora_package_development.html https://gitlab.cern.ch/eos/eos-folly/commit/e213d77fa90019b17d5d56830156302aedfa901d not saying those are right/reliable, just frequent -- and what was found. i've been working with Fedora for a whopping 3-4 days now; a bit challenging at 1st to find thorough docs / examples on this^ and of course, the 'migration' isn't, atm, helping get at useful info ... _______________________________________________ copr-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
