On 6/25/20 2:04 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> nope ... I can give it a whirl. tho' not clear on what that tells me, or why >> it might be a 'solution' > > That may answer the question if that is Copr problem, package problem or rpm > problem. It looks like RPM problem to some extent to me, so I filled: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851238
thanks, subscribed. > Speaking of solutions, either don't %undefine the macro at all (remove the > line), or re-define it to 0. > >>>> i'll change it in my spec in any case. >>> >>> Good, just let me know it is OK. done, in other followup email > Things should work out of box, but googling this problem actually guided > you to broken use-case, you found a corner case. Let's wait for 1851238 > resolution. +1 o/ _______________________________________________ copr-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
