Jean-Marc Liger via copr-devel venit, vidit, dixit 2026-01-24 11:05:50: > Hi, this problem persists and causes all builds to fail on rhel+epel > > Le 22/01/2026 à 21:47, Jean-Marc Liger via copr-devel a écrit : > > Hi, I'm facing this issue: > > GPG key > > atfile:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/redhat/RPM-GPG-KEY-redhat10-release > > (0x5A6340B3) is already installed > > GPG key > > atfile:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/redhat/RPM-GPG-KEY-redhat10-release > > (0xFD431D51) is already installed > > The GPG keys listed for the "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 for x86_64 - > > BaseOS (RPMs)" repository are already installed but they are not correct > > for this package. > > Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository.. > > Failing package is: glib2-2.80.4-10.el10_1.12.x86_64 > > GPG Keys are configured > > as:file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/redhat/RPM-GPG-KEY-redhat10-release > > Error: GPG check FAILED > > > > Copr build error: Build failed
Yes, this is not a COPR problem per se, "only" a problem for COPR and other mock users. Someone(TM) pushed RHEL packages signed by keys which non-RHEL mock hosts cannot parse, because they wanted PQC signatures so badly, at a time when not even sequoia appears to supports them. There's nothing we can do. The problem is bad enough so that people are looking for solutions, though. Michael -- _______________________________________________ copr-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
