Le 24/01/2026 à 13:13, Michael J Gruber via copr-devel a écrit :
Jean-Marc Liger via copr-devel venit, vidit, dixit 2026-01-24 11:05:50:
Hi, this problem persists and causes all builds to fail on rhel+epel

Le 22/01/2026 à 21:47, Jean-Marc Liger via copr-devel a écrit :
Hi, I'm facing this issue:
GPG key 
atfile:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/redhat/RPM-GPG-KEY-redhat10-release 
(0x5A6340B3) is already installed
GPG key 
atfile:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/redhat/RPM-GPG-KEY-redhat10-release 
(0xFD431D51) is already installed
The GPG keys listed for the "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 for x86_64 - BaseOS 
(RPMs)" repository are already installed but they are not correct for this package.
Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository.. Failing 
package is: glib2-2.80.4-10.el10_1.12.x86_64
   GPG Keys are configured 
as:file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/redhat/RPM-GPG-KEY-redhat10-release
Error: GPG check FAILED

Copr build error: Build failed
Yes, this is not a COPR problem per se, "only" a problem for COPR and
other mock users. Someone(TM) pushed RHEL packages signed by keys which
non-RHEL mock hosts cannot parse, because they wanted PQC signatures so
badly, at a time when not even sequoia appears to supports them.

There's nothing we can do. The problem is bad enough so that people are
looking for solutions, though.

Michael

So the situation is therefore complex and will be blocked for a few days. Thank you for these explanations.I've temporarily bypassed the problem with a makeshift solution: I created a Stream+Epel 10 repository, added it as an additional repository, and recompiled the blocking packages with a higher release to work around the parse key error.

Jean-Marc

-- 
_______________________________________________
copr-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Reply via email to