[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12591908#action_12591908
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-3294:
-----------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12380810/3294_20080423b.patch
against trunk revision 645773.
@author +1. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
tests included -1. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
tests.
Please justify why no tests are needed for this patch.
javadoc +1. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
javac +1. The applied patch does not generate any new javac compiler
warnings.
release audit +1. The applied patch does not generate any new release
audit warnings.
findbugs +1. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.
core tests +1. The patch passed core unit tests.
contrib tests +1. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2315/testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2315/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2315/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html
Console output:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hadoop-Patch/2315/console
This message is automatically generated.
> distcp leaves empty blocks afte successful execution
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-3294
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3294
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: util
> Affects Versions: 0.16.3
> Environment: 0.16.3 without any patches. Dfs permissions turned off
> everywhere, such that HADOOP-3138 and HADOOP-3186 do not apply
> Reporter: Christian Kunz
> Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE
> Attachments: 3294_20080423.patch, 3294_20080423b.patch
>
>
> I copied around 40 TB between two hadoop clusters, with distcp running on
> source.
> Job was *successful*, but one destination file was empty because of its only
> block being empty.
> None of the distcp log files have any mentioning of this file.
> There were a couple of messages in the namenode server log of the destination
> cluster referencing the file:
> hadoop-xxxnamenode-yyy.log.2008-04-19:2008-04-19 02:19:15,666 INFO
> org.apache.hadoop.dfs.StateChange: BLOCK* NameSystem.allocateBlock:
> destinationDir/_distcp_tmp_z0g93p/fileName. blk_-9209890281741927376
> hadoop-xxx-namenode-yyy.log.2008-04-19:2008-04-19 02:54:45,820 WARN
> org.apache.hadoop.dfs.StateChange: DIR* NameSystem.internalReleaseCreate:
> attempt to release a create lock on
> destinationDir/_distcp_tmp_z0g93p/fileName file does not exist.
> distcp should not rely on the user to double-check.
> Would it make sense to add a reducer to compare destination file sizes with
> source files sizes and do some appropriate action?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.