[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12592222#action_12592222
 ] 

Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-3294:
---------------------------------------

bq. As a matter of fact, speculative execution was enabled before launching 
distcp

Running distcp with speculative execution turned on is definitely not 
supported. It disables it before starting the job, but if it's somehow turned 
on during the copy, then its behavior- particularly with \-update or 
\-override- is undefined.

> distcp leaves empty blocks afte successful execution
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-3294
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-3294
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: util
>    Affects Versions: 0.16.3
>         Environment: 0.16.3 without any patches. Dfs permissions turned off 
> everywhere, such that HADOOP-3138 and HADOOP-3186 do not apply
>            Reporter: Christian Kunz
>            Assignee: Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.17.0
>
>         Attachments: 3294_20080423.patch, 3294_20080423b.patch
>
>
> I copied around 40 TB between two hadoop clusters, with distcp running on 
> source.
> Job was *successful*, but one destination file was empty because of its only 
> block being empty.
> None of the distcp log files have any mentioning of this file.
> There were a couple of messages in the namenode server log of the destination 
> cluster referencing the file:
> hadoop-xxxnamenode-yyy.log.2008-04-19:2008-04-19 02:19:15,666 INFO 
> org.apache.hadoop.dfs.StateChange: BLOCK* NameSystem.allocateBlock: 
> destinationDir/_distcp_tmp_z0g93p/fileName. blk_-9209890281741927376
> hadoop-xxx-namenode-yyy.log.2008-04-19:2008-04-19 02:54:45,820 WARN 
> org.apache.hadoop.dfs.StateChange: DIR* NameSystem.internalReleaseCreate: 
> attempt to release a create lock on 
> destinationDir/_distcp_tmp_z0g93p/fileName file does not exist.
> distcp should not rely on the user to double-check.
> Would it make sense to add a reducer  to compare destination file sizes with 
> source files sizes and do some appropriate action?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to