[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628576#action_12628576
]
dhruba borthakur commented on HADOOP-4018:
------------------------------------------
I like the idea of making JobInProgress.totalAlloctedTasks be a synchronized
method. But making the JobTracker.totalAlloctedTasks be a synchronized method
might be bad because it violates locking hierarcy, right? I am assuming that
one cannot acquire the jobTracker lock is one already has the JobInProgress
lock. Do we really need to make JobTracker.totalAllocatedTasks be a
synchronized method?
> limit memory usage in jobtracker
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-4018
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4018
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: mapred
> Reporter: dhruba borthakur
> Assignee: dhruba borthakur
> Attachments: maxSplits.patch, maxSplits2.patch, maxSplits3.patch,
> maxSplits4.patch, maxSplits5.patch, maxSplits6.patch
>
>
> We have seen instances when a user submitted a job with many thousands of
> mappers. The JobTracker was running with 3GB heap, but it was still not
> enough to prevent memory trashing from Garbage collection; effectively the
> Job Tracker was not able to serve jobs and had to be restarted.
> One simple proposal would be to limit the maximum number of tasks per job.
> This can be a configurable parameter. Is there other things that eat huge
> globs of memory in job Tracker?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
