[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12651770#action_12651770
 ] 

Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-1650:
---------------------------------------

{quote}
In your patch(converting jetty5 to 6), I noticed that 
SelectChannelConnector.setUseDirectBuffers(boolean) is set to false.
Any reason behind it?
{quote}
Deveraj ran into some GC issues in the last attempted migration (above) and 
some previous experiences with direct buffers left me wary. For the initial 
checkin, it made more sense to track down any stability problems we run into 
without the direct buffer noise. We can certainly revisit it when considering 
other optimizations and I certainly wouldn't be against making it configurable.

> Upgrade Jetty to 6.x
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-1650
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1650
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: mapred
>            Reporter: Devaraj Das
>            Assignee: Chris Douglas
>             Fix For: 0.20.0
>
>         Attachments: 1650-0.patch, 1650-1_core.patch, 1650-1_merge.patch, 
> 1650-1_proxy_delta.patch, 1650-2.patch, 1650-20080120.patch, 
> 1650-jetty6.1.9.patch, 1650-jetty6.1.9.v1.patch, 
> hadoop-1650-jetty6.1.5.patch, hadoop-jetty6.1.4-lib.tar.gz, 
> hadoop-jetty6.1.6-lib.tar.gz, hadoop-jetty6.1.9-lib.tar.gz, 
> jetty-hadoop-6.1.6.patch, jetty-hbase.patch, jetty6.1.4.patch, 
> jetty6.1.6.patch, shuffleData.zip
>
>
> This is the third attempt at moving to jetty6. Apparently, the jetty-6.1.4 
> has fixed some of the issues we discovered in jetty during HADOOP-736 and 
> HADOOP-1273. I'd like to keep this issue open for sometime so that we have 
> enough time to test out things.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to