[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12690000#action_12690000
]
Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-5528:
---------------------------------------
Please don't hesitate to pick the semantics. After all, this is your patch. If
you prefer python semantics to "python-like," then by all means: go that route.
I mentioned the original comment only to explain where I was coming from, as
part of our disagreement stemmed from a mismatch in our understanding. I have
no opinion on which are "better", as both are equivalently expressive.
I'm +1 on the current patch, and would not object if the indices were adjusted
to fit the former semantics.
> Binary partitioner
> ------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-5528
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5528
> Project: Hadoop Core
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: mapred
> Reporter: Klaas Bosteels
> Assignee: Klaas Bosteels
> Attachments: HADOOP-5528.patch, HADOOP-5528.patch, HADOOP-5528.patch,
> HADOOP-5528.patch, HADOOP-5528.patch
>
>
> It would be useful to have a {{BinaryPartitioner}} that partitions
> {{BinaryComparable}} keys by hashing a configurable part of the bytes array
> corresponding to each key.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
