[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12716810#action_12716810 ]
Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HADOOP-5985: ------------------------------------------------ > ... some number of seconds (let's say 30) ... This probably should depend on the map running time. 30 seconds are nothing if the running time is 2 hours. I do not understand the algorithm in every detail. Could give an example? > A single slow (but not dead) map TaskTracker impedes MapReduce progress > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HADOOP-5985 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5985 > Project: Hadoop Core > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 0.18.3 > Reporter: Aaron Kimball > > We see cases where there may be a large number of mapper nodes running many > tasks (e.g., a thousand). The reducers will pull 980 of the map task > intermediate files down, but will be unable to retrieve the final > intermediate shards from the last node. The TaskTracker on that node returns > data to reducers either slowly or not at all, but its heartbeat messages make > it back to the JobTracker -- so the JobTracker doesn't mark the tasks as > failed. Manually stopping the offending TaskTracker works to migrate the > tasks to other nodes, where the shuffling process finishes very quickly. Left > on its own, it can take hours to unjam itself otherwise. > We need a mechanism for reducers to provide feedback to the JobTracker that > one of the mapper nodes should be regarded as lost. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.