On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 23:43 -0500, Paul Benedict wrote: > I've always found it a bit perplexing that java.lang was never chosen > for the parent package of the Dynamic API. Why is that? Dynamic types > are now "part of the language" as proven by spec itself and exotic > identifiers. Will this be reconsidered?
[I'm forwarding this question to mlvm-dev.] I think John Rose or another member of the EG should have an answer to this. -- Christian
