On Feb 27, 5:49pm, marti...@google.com (Martin Buchholz) wrote: -- Subject: Re: Codereview needed for #6929479
| On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:09, Lance J. Andersen <lance.ander...@sun.com> wrote: | > Going forward, should we be using sun or oracle in the property names? | | It is impractical to stamp out the "sun" in the API, | even though it's "private". | | There are too many references to sun.* in third party code to | consider a massive rename, and the system properties | need to match the class hierarchy. I urge Oracle to simply keep | the sun.* and com.sun.* conventions. Not only I would like to chime in here, but I would also like to add that we really should not start a new oracle.* and com.oracle.* hierarchies because their only worth is vanity, and it will only make things more difficult to organize and find. christos
