Ping, anyone notice this? :)
My plan is that we'd search all source to find all kinds of such issues,
and then refine them in a uniform solution. If jint is not good enough,
how about ssize_t?
于 2011-7-5 17:14, Jing LV 写道:
Hello,
It's been quite a long time and it seems jdk7 is doing well now. I
know there is still several days before its release, anyway, Alan or
someone else, would you please tell me if we can start work on jdk8,
and restart the discussion on the bugs like this (I remember there are
still some to be discussed)? Thanks!
于 2011-5-5 14:22, Jing LV 写道:
于 2011-4-26 16:43, Alan Bateman 写道:
Jing LV wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for raising the defect. I see there is no patch now, so
I create one (as the defect mentioned jint may be good, I use jint
here).
I have no Sun Online Account Id, would someone take a look?
The function prototypes would also require to be updated and there
are a couple of other areas that would require clean-up too. If it's
okay with you, I think we should postpone this to jdk8. This code
has been using size_t for many years and I don't think is actually
causing a real problem. I agree it should be cleaned up but we are
out of time in jdk7. Another point is that jdk8 will be our
opportunity to remove the dependencies on the JVM_* functions and so
this code will be changing anyway (I realize we're not using these
in the Windows code but the functions need to match as they are used
from shared code).
-Alan.
Hi Alan,
I am OK with Java8. And I am wondering if a portlib or something
may help. I'd think deeper and provide some proposal.
--
Best Regards,
Jimmy, Jing LV
