On 28/10/2011 23:44, Darryl Mocek wrote:
Hello. Please review this patch to add empty sorted set to the
Collections class. Test case provided.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/4533691/1/webrev/
Additional Notes to Reviewers:
The sets resulting from tailSet() headSet() and subSet() normally
include the range which was used to create them. Using these methods
with emptySortedSet() does not currently set a range on the resulting
sets.
Just to add to Jason's comment, would it be better to just leave out
EMPTY_SORTED_SET from this patch? It would be nice not to have to load
yet another class when Collections is first used and I assume we would
encourage folks to use Collections.emptySortedSet() anyway so that they
get type safety.
-Alan.
