Mike,
I see that you have pushed a version of this change and that I was
listed as a reviewer. However I never saw an updated webrev and there
was no response to my query below. In fact I never saw any response to
any of the reviewers comments on this.
David
On 31/10/2011 10:52 AM, David Holmes wrote:
Darryl,
On 29/10/2011 8:44 AM, Darryl Mocek wrote:
Hello. Please review this patch to add empty sorted set to the
Collections class. Test case provided.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/4533691/1/webrev/
This was an RFE from 2001 - pre-generics. I don't think it makes sense
to add to the pre-generics pollution by defining EMPTY_SORTED_SET.
Additional Notes to Reviewers:
The sets resulting from tailSet() headSet() and subSet() normally
include the range which was used to create them. Using these methods
with emptySortedSet() does not currently set a range on the resulting
sets.
What is the range on an empty set?
David
-----
Thanks,
Darryl
