On 17/02/2012 12:37, David Holmes wrote:
On 17/02/2012 10:11 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 17/02/2012 12:00, Rémi Forax wrote:
:
Better with the attachment inlined :)
Thanks Rémi, this looks okay to me although I probably would have used
putObjectVolatile for the path field.
You only need one "volatile" store and it should be the last one. The
approximate affect is:
path = ...
membar: LoadStore | StoreStore
prefixlength = ...
membar: StoreLoad
I understand, I just remarking that I probably would have used a
volatile store for both to make it clearer but that would be less
efficient.
-Alan
