Am 17.02.2012 13:54, schrieb Rémi Forax:
On 02/17/2012 01:41 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I understand, I just remarking that I probably would have used a volatile store for both to make
it clearer but that would be less efficient.
Knowing that some codes already serialize File instances, I wanted
to minimize the perf impact of this change.
That's why I've put only one volatile store even if I agree with Alan that
it's better to use two putObjectVolatile for the readability.
Maybe too late, but what about adding a comment on that to the source code.
-Ulf
