[adding core-libs-dev back in.. not sure how that got lost] > [Back from vacation, let's get the ball rolling again… :] > >> In order to understand and explain here is a truth table: >> >> Cmd line FAC LAUNCH_MODE JAVAFX_LAUNCH_MODE >> java -jar fxapp.jar Present LM_JAR LM_JAR >> java -jar fxapp.jar Not present LM_JAR LM_CLASS ?? >> java -cp fxapp.jar ... Not present LM_CLASS LM_CLASS >> java -cp somedir ... Not present LM_CLASS LM_CLASS >> >> If I am understanding this correctly, the confusion stems from the second >> case where the >> value is interpreted in different ways. > > Correct. I have actually changed it to fix this case, and IMHO it cleans up > the launcher code a bit.. I'll post the webrev when I'm done syncing with TL.
The current patch I have: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddehaven/8004547/webrev.2/ Minor change to accommodate this in FX LauncherImpl (needs a new JIRA issue?): http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddehaven/javafx/RT-26751/webrev.2/ This was all working fine when I left for vacation, I'm still in the process of building/testing everything and will submit a JPRT run as soon as possible. I had commented out two tests, but FX is in sync with JDK *and* they'll pass vacuously until FX is on the ext classpath anyways so I don't think that's necessary. -DrD-
