On 03/15/13 09:43, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 15/03/2013 12:00, Doug Lea wrote:
Yes, thanks! This keeps the exception specs consistent across similar
methods.
Now that I reread these method descriptions, I think thenAcceptBothXXX suffer
the same problem:
Yes; thanks. And also a few other cases of non-symmetric doc/code
constructions. Martin and I (thanks Martin!) did a couple of passes
to try to hit them all. (Chris: maybe you could resync with CVS?)
The slogan for this class is: We write all the variants
so users never have to. Some of the variants were added during a
set of exchanges on concurrency-interest list last fall, which
let some gratuitous differences creep in.
-Doug
