Sorry, just finished one more (final?) round of exception spec updates, notably to change "unchecked exception" to "exception", since the code catches any Throwable.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hega...@oracle.com>wrote: > Updated specdiff and webrev. Unless I hear otherwise, I think the API is > as good as final. > > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~**chegar/8005696/ver.01/** > specdiff/java/util/concurrent/**package-summary.html<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8005696/ver.01/specdiff/java/util/concurrent/package-summary.html> > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~**chegar/8005696/ver.01/webrev/<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8005696/ver.01/webrev/> > > -Chris > > > On 03/18/2013 02:10 PM, Doug Lea wrote: > >> On 03/15/13 09:43, Chris Hegarty wrote: >> >>> On 15/03/2013 12:00, Doug Lea wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, thanks! This keeps the exception specs consistent across similar >>>> methods. >>>> >>> >>> Now that I reread these method descriptions, I think thenAcceptBothXXX >>> suffer >>> the same problem: >>> >> >> Yes; thanks. And also a few other cases of non-symmetric doc/code >> constructions. Martin and I (thanks Martin!) did a couple of passes >> to try to hit them all. (Chris: maybe you could resync with CVS?) >> >> The slogan for this class is: We write all the variants >> so users never have to. Some of the variants were added during a >> set of exchanges on concurrency-interest list last fall, which >> let some gratuitous differences creep in. >> >> -Doug >> >> >> >>
