On 3/21/13 12:04 PM, Holger Hoffstaette wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:12:07 +0100, Laurent Bourgès wrote:
[..]
FYI, I removed completely the Map<Integer, Object> levelObjects and used
two arrays to perform the PlatformLogger's level (int) to j.u.l.Level
mapping:
[..]
FWIW I know of at least one (quite old) project that declares custom
j.u.l. Levels and which would be broken by this change. I personally don't
care (since I think both j.u.l. and custom log levels are wrong to begin
with :), but it's something to keep in mind. Maybe a Map-based mapping
could be used as fallback, while the array-indexed lookups take the heat
off of the common case. Just a suggestion.
Why would the platform logger ever use custom levels though?
--
- DML
