On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:39:19 +0000, David M. Lloyd wrote: > On 3/21/13 12:04 PM, Holger Hoffstaette wrote: >> On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:12:07 +0100, Laurent Bourgès wrote: >> >> [..] >>> FYI, I removed completely the Map<Integer, Object> levelObjects and >>> used two arrays to perform the PlatformLogger's level (int) to >>> j.u.l.Level mapping: >> [..] >> >> FWIW I know of at least one (quite old) project that declares custom >> j.u.l. Levels and which would be broken by this change. I personally >> don't care (since I think both j.u.l. and custom log levels are wrong to >> begin with :), but it's something to keep in mind. Maybe a Map-based >> mapping could be used as fallback, while the array-indexed lookups take >> the heat off of the common case. Just a suggestion. > > Why would the platform logger ever use custom levels though?
<shuffles feet> Absolutely right - "very likely" it would not. "Good point!" :) -h
