Thanks, Martin,
We've all heard of code "smells" -- I hereby dub this a code "chuckle" :-)
The change looks good to me otherwise as well.
Thanks,
Jim
On 03/28/2013 12:05 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
I took Laurent's suggestion of renaming count to c, even though the result
looks like a value judgement on a competing programming environment:
value[c++] = 'n';
value[c++] = 'u';
value[c++] = 'l';
value[c++] = 'l';
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Laurent Bourgès <bourges.laur...@gmail.com
wrote:
Maybe the local var count could be renamed _count or c to avoid name
conflict with the member count and make the code more readable / obvious.
--
Jim Gish | Consulting Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.0304
Oracle Java Platform Group | Core Libraries Team
35 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
jim.g...@oracle.com