Would it be WIDTH or WIDTH - 1, i.e., with or without the "implied" bit?
On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Louis Wasserman wrote: > The comments mention SIGNIFICAND_BITS, which I think should probably be > SIGNIFICAND_WIDTH?
Would it be WIDTH or WIDTH - 1, i.e., with or without the "implied" bit?
On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Louis Wasserman wrote: > The comments mention SIGNIFICAND_BITS, which I think should probably be > SIGNIFICAND_WIDTH?